阅读内容

红帽为什么要放弃桌面Linux的5个理由

[日期:2008-05-18] 来源:Linux公社  作者:Linux整理


自从红帽公司宣布将放弃桌面Linux市场的时候,到现在已经1个多月了,还有许多人对红帽公司的举动不能够理解。但是我们不这么认为,相反,我们在认真的分析了红帽的策略后发现,红帽公司的决策是非常正确的,以下是为什么红帽放弃桌面Linux的一些理由:

钱是第一位的,首先桌面Linux的市场份额有限,相对于服务器操作系统市场,红帽更看好后者。

其次,应用程序,桌面Linux'的应用程序相对于微软的桌面操作系统一点优势都没有。



第三,现在流行SaaS,以后更多的桌面市场将会消失,包括桌面和移动设备,因为一切可以通过浏览器的能得到。

第四,IBM OS2的前车之鉴

第五,Ubuntu现在在Linux桌面系统市场风生水起,跟他直面竞争没有好处。

Okay, it has been about a month since Red Hat said it had no plans to offer a consumer Linux release. Lots of folks went ballistic. The VAR Guy didn’t. Instead, he took some time to digest the news. And now he’s ready to say — definitively — that Red Hat made the right decision. Here are five reasons why Red Hat should ignore pleas for a consumer Linux release.

1. Money: Where is Red Hat going to generate the best profit margins and recurring revenue? The consumer desktop business is cutthroat. Meanwhile, global 2000 companies are willing to pay for ongoing service and support for higher-margin server deployments. That’s Red Hat’s sweet spot. And Red Hat should double down on that market by pushing deeper into applications that complement Linux.

2. Applications: Sure, Microsoft makes a ton of money selling Windows and the Office suite. But there’s no equivalent revenue opportunity in the open source world. Yes, OpenOffice is super hot. But is there really money to be made from open source desktop applications? If so, Red Hat certainly doesn’t own any of them.

3. Software as a Service: The real desktop opportunity involves SaaS. Desktops and mobile devices increasingly rely on Web browsers to access hosted applications. So there’s less software revenue opportunity on the desktop, but increasing revenue opportunity on servers with SaaS.

4. IBM OS/2 Warp: This entry should incite a few thousand angry readers. But here we go. Anybody else remember when IBM tried to make the leap from corporate software into the consumer market? It was a nightmare. Big Blue didn’t understand consumer support models, and thousands of customers wound up frustrated. The same would happen with Red Hat, which isn’t organized to support consumers.

5. Ubuntu: Right now, Canonical’s Ubuntu Linux is the desktop darling of the open source world. Wonderful. Let Canonical continue to enjoy that spotlight. If Ubuntu truly goes mainstream, then Red Hat can mull buying Canonical. If Ubuntu never gains critical mass in the mainstream market, Red Hat can continue to take a wait-and-see approach to consumer Linux. (Full disclosure: The VAR Guy blogs about Ubuntu over on his sister site, Works With U.)

Ultimately, there’s no good business reason for Red Hat to move into the consumer desktop market right now. Linux advocates who claim otherwise are making emotional — rather than business-driven — statements.

Bottom line:

* Red Hat has a strong corporate server business.
* Red Hat is struggling to get its corporate desktop business moving in the right direction.
* Adding consumer challenges to the mix would be foolish.




本文评论       全部评论
发表评论
  • 尊重网上道德,遵守中华人民共和国的各项有关法律法规
  • 承担一切因您的行为而直接或间接导致的民事或刑事法律责任
  • 本站管理人员有权保留或删除其管辖留言中的任意内容
  • 本站有权在网站内转载或引用您的评论
  • 参与本评论即表明您已经阅读并接受上述条款


点评: 字数
姓名:

L
I
N
U
X


GOOGLE搜索
Google